"The Spirit of the Apostles is not a guide equal or greater than the Lord, thus Paul within his letters does not have as much authority as has Christ" (Carlstadt, Canonicis Scripturis (1520)
"The Spirit of the Apostles is not a guide equal or greater than the Lord, thus Paul within his letters does not have as much authority as has Christ" (Carlstadt, Canonicis Scripturis (1520)
|
Search
|
|
Questions?
Click Here to Send Us an Email.
|
|
Recommendations
Only Jesus (great song by Big Daddy) What Did Jesus Say? (2012) - 7 topics None above affiliated with me |
Books:
Jul 8, 2022
Prior to 1611, no Bible ever read "all scripture is inspired, and is profitable," etc, with the exception of the Geneva Bible of 1599.
The English Bible of Wycliffe of 1395, and Tyndale of 1534, have "all scripture inspired of God is useful, etc." Every Bible before them had it likewise, going back to the Syriac and Vulgate translations, and the church fathers, etc. It may be that Syriac and Vulgate were looking at older manuscripts than we have as resources today, and hence were translating the "is" in the right spot -- the 2d "is" in the current KJV of 2 Tim. 3:16.
This perpetuation of this fabrication has led people to think because later publishers, first Constantine with his Constantine's Bible as "Scriptura" and every Bible thereafter that labesl something as "Scripture" even though not accepted by a canon-committee of any conference, leaves it for the laity to assume it is inspired canon. However, what is inspired should be a momentous decision after careful analysis. The Jews would have elaborate conferences before accepting something in canon. Christianity never did that until the Roman Catholic Church did that at the Council of Trent in 1543.
PROOF OF SELF-CONTRADICTION IN SCRIPTURE NECESSITATES REVIEW WHO IS INSPIRED: Paul or Jesus? [My $$$ is on Jesus.[
Not all "scripture" can be inspired if two passages contradict in the same "Scripture" -- thus proving all alone that the 2 Tim. 3:16 is either itself false as translated, or must be mistranslated by adding the first "is" in the sentence.
For example, we proved 2 clear cut examples where "graphe" cannot be inspired and are in the NT - one or the other must fail the test - when Jesus says the Temple at Jerusalem is where his father dwells, and Jesus elsewhere says it was built with "human hands," vs. Paul who says in Acts 17 that God does "not dwell in temples made of human hands."
Paul says "God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands." (Acts 17:24)(Greek cheiropoietois - hand-made).
However, Jesus said in a correction of Pharisees who thought an oath offered "by" articles offered at the Temple were binding but not an oath by the Temple at Jerusalem itself: "And he who swears by the temple swears by it and by the one who dwells in it." (Matt. 23:21.) Jesus elsewhere referred to the Temple at Jerusalem as a "Temple made with hands." (Mark 14:58)(Greek cheiropoieton, 'made with hands.')
Hence, both Paul and Jesus cannot both be correct, yet are in the same "Scripture." Hence, the word "graphe" cannot imply ipso facto something is inspired. Here, either Paul or Jesus are uninspired. I put my money on Jesus that he is inspired.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Click Here for the Complete List of JWO Videos
